They… Just can’t figure out why they keep seeing these weird, ‘illogical’ things in their samples(!)
I’m watching a BBS series ‘the planets (episode 7, Life)’, and this one guy is marveling over that he found the chemical footprint of life in a sample of some of the oldest ocean sediment that exists..
Basically it means there was life almost immediately after the world was formed
interesting
*coughGodcough*
as that can only happen in one scenario
Mmmmhmmm. Creation.
‘Perhaps it’s a sort of cosmic imperative that life should appear as a chemical consequence of the evolution of a planet’
.. quoth the scientist
nevermore…
I would laugh until I cry.. if it weren’t nearly 3am. XD
Basically it means there was life almost immediately after the world was formed
interesting
*coughGodcough*
as that can only happen in one scenario
Mmmmhmmm. Creation.
‘Perhaps it’s a sort of cosmic imperative that life should appear as a chemical consequence of the evolution of a planet’
.. quoth the scientist
nevermore…
I would laugh until I cry.. if it weren’t nearly 3am. XD
Category: Blog
|
Friday, 10. November 2006
Erm, You realise that that actualy means nothing. “Oldest ocean sediments there are” There is a great deal of stone that is older then that. Further, much stone is melted and reformed (Think marble) which removes all traces of fossles. All that proves is that life evolved prior to the stone that is applicable. The earth has been around much longer then the ocean sediments. The solar system longer then that.
And if it is creation, then who’s? I always favored that one with the two twin brothers who had the fight… And there is a group that belived that their creator deity sneezed the universe into existance…
You have to realise that not only in the christain vewipoint not the only one, but christians are one of the only three religious groups that hold religious teachings that prevent the existance from any other. And the other two are Islam and Jeudisim.
Evolution occured. We have ample proof. The universe was spontaniously generated from a state of perfect entropy. We have mathamatacle proof of that (This is different from actual proof… But not by much). And we have physical proof of how the earth was made (It condensed out of the solar disk that formed when out sun made it’s self.) And last I checked the earth was not flat, and the universe was not heliocentric.
We have no proof of Creation of any sort or type. Except for a handfull of books written when people drank cat’s blood mixed with milk to ward off deseases
[Translate]
Saturday, 11. November 2006
Erm, Sorry if my post upset you though. I’m nonreligious. I don’t belive in evolution, because there is nothing to belive in. It is fact. No faith, no belife. Just is. Like a table.
And if the bible is applyed to complex things like physics and archeology and other such stuff, you get even worse contradictions, and “illogical” things. Same for the Tora, same for the Koran, same for the Dao, same for Buddisits, same for Confusists.
Trust me on this. I’m going major in some branch of sciences or other, just have not decided yet, and so I am learning about all of them.
[Translate]
Saturday, 9. December 2006
Yes, I understand completely all your points, and *snicker* your reference to the Hitchiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. The great Argyle Snorgleblaster, that formed the universe when it sneezed and blew out their planet and all the life on it!
Two twin brothers who had the fight? I have no idea who those would be, please tell me the myth. I agree that if the facts of our universe, geology, fossils, solar system, the earth and the moon itself, and the bible do not agree, all of is sheer myth and imagination. I wrote you a long email letter in return to address some of the materials that you mentioned in your opening comment/statement.
I find it interesting that you say you do not believe in evolution, and so I wonder what you think really did form the life on earth. I am perfectly aware of the aggregation theory of the solar system’s formation, but you really should see one of the BBC’s productions on the idea of the earth and moon being formed at the same time, colliding, and then spinning off to create two perfect spheres by the aggregation rock bodies in molten form, collisions and gravitational force forcing the growing moon into a wider and wider orbit, until cooling until it is at the size and shape it is today. The earth’s formative rocks are of the same chemical makeup as the moon’s, and this shows they formed in a dance of rotation, fire and molten rock.
AiG’s Rapid Rocks article also is very interesting material about granites dating to the cooling of the first magma of the earth’s crust, and evidence in the rock for water saturation within the magma itself before the rock rapidly cooled, creating the veins of quartz found within these large ancient rocks.
Anyways, I am compressing a BBC production from the series ‘The Planets‘, the episode called ‘The Moon’ which explains the geology of rock samples fetched from the moon, the history of the lunar expeditions both American and Russian, and the series comes highly recommended for all who are fascinated by our universe.
Expect an article in my fuller response to your comments, which I sent to you by email, in my next blog post.
[Translate]